Do Not Use 'Old' in a Part Title - Revision history

Steffen at 00:42, 8 April 2018

2018-04-08T00:42:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:42, 8 April 2018
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Certification: hold		Certification: hold
	Comments:		Comments:
	~~that's no whim :-)~~
	We have followed over years now the practice of abolishing		We have followed over years now the practice of abolishing
	every word "Old" in the titles of parts when they get onto the Parts Tracker. I just ask to continue doing this.		every word "Old" in the titles of parts when they get onto the Parts Tracker. I just ask to continue doing this.

Steffen at 00:42, 8 April 2018

2018-04-08T00:42:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:42, 8 April 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	From [http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x584.dat this discussion]		From [http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x584.dat this discussion]

	<~~code~~>		<pre>
	At Sun Jan 1 15:35:02 2012, the following review was posted:		At Sun Jan 1 15:35:02 2012, the following review was posted:

Line 10:		Line 10:
	We have followed over years now the practice of abolishing		We have followed over years now the practice of abolishing
	every word "Old" in the titles of parts when they get onto the Parts Tracker. I just ask to continue doing this.		every word "Old" in the titles of parts when they get onto the Parts Tracker. I just ask to continue doing this.
	</~~code~~>		</pre>

	~~-- mikeheide~~

	[[Category:New Ideas for Future Official Parts Standards]]		[[Category:New Ideas for Future Official Parts Standards]]

Steffen at 00:41, 8 April 2018

2018-04-08T00:41:31Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-This page can be used to keep de facto standards on the part tracker in one place. Which means even if the past discussion is gone the established practise can still be read by any part author.
+From [http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x584.dat this discussion]
 <code>
@@ Line 16: / Line 11: @@
 every word "Old" in the titles of parts when they get onto the Parts Tracker. I just ask to continue doing this.
 </code>

Steffen: Steffen moved page De Facto PT Standards to Do Not Use 'Old' in a Part Title

2018-04-08T00:40:41Z

Steffen moved page De Facto PT Standards to Do Not Use 'Old' in a Part Title

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:40, 8 April 2018
(No difference)

Timgould at 22:23, 1 January 2012

2012-01-01T22:23:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:23, 1 January 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
			This page can be used to keep de facto standards on the part tracker in one place. Which means even if the past discussion is gone the established practise can still be read by any part author.


	== Parts with 'old' in the name ==		== Parts with 'old' in the name ==

Timgould at 22:20, 1 January 2012

2012-01-01T22:20:00Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Parts with 'old' in the name ==
-<verbatim>
+From [http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x584.dat This discussion]
-Reviewer: Steffen
+<code>
 At Sun Jan 1 15:35:02 2012, the following review was posted:
@@ Line 59: / Line 12: @@
 We have followed over years now the practice of abolishing
 every word "Old" in the titles of parts when they get onto the Parts Tracker. I just ask to continue doing this.
-</verbatim>
+</code>

Timgould at 22:15, 1 January 2012

2012-01-01T22:15:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 1 January 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Parts with 'old' in the name]]		== Parts with 'old' in the name ==

	<~~code~~>		<verbatim>
	======================================================================		======================================================================
	At Mon May 4 00:08:03 2009, the following review was posted:		At Mon May 4 00:08:03 2009, the following review was posted:
Line 59:		Line 59:
	We have followed over years now the practice of abolishing		We have followed over years now the practice of abolishing
	every word "Old" in the titles of parts when they get onto the Parts Tracker. I just ask to continue doing this.		every word "Old" in the titles of parts when they get onto the Parts Tracker. I just ask to continue doing this.
	</~~code~~>		</verbatim>

Timgould: Created page with "Parts with 'old' in the name `====================================================================== At Mon May 4 00:08:03 2009, the following review was posted: R..."`


2012-01-01T22:13:56Z
Created page with "Parts with 'old' in the name  <code> ====================================================================== At Mon May 4 00:08:03 2009, the following review was posted:  R..."
New page
[[Parts with 'old' in the name]]



<code>

======================================================================

At Mon May 4 00:08:03 2009, the following review was posted:



Reviewer: Steffen

Certification: hold

Comments:

"old" should be removed from part name.

(Each part at some point in time will become "old".)



======================================================================

At Sat Dec 31 22:55:06 2011, the following review was posted:



Reviewer: timgould

Certification: certify

Comments:

Think the old is appropriate here. Other bushes are variants of each other but this represents an old, depreciated 'standard'.







======================================================================

At Sun Jan 1 04:30:06 2012, the following review was posted:



Reviewer: Steffen

Certification: hold

Comments:

I know, but we usually do not add "old" to titles, though.

The reason is that every part potentially can become "old",

when something new comes out which replaces it.

We describe what the part is and does, and that's it.

Its age is not part of its function.



======================================================================

At Sun Jan 1 09:05:04 2012, the following review was posted:



Reviewer: timgould

Certification: certify

Comments:

The part fits with the existing library Old Type 2. Hold is, IMO, inappropriate unless you are willing to change both the existing file and this one with a new standard. Otherwise it is just reducing approved parts for your whims.





======================================================================

At Sun Jan 1 10:30:07 2012, the following review was posted:



Reviewer: mikeheide

Certification: novote

Comments:

I am with Steffen here. If we have another part in the library with 'old' then we should also change that parts description.



======================================================================

At Sun Jan 1 15:35:02 2012, the following review was posted:



Reviewer: Steffen

Certification: hold

Comments:

that's no whim :-)

We have followed over years now the practice of abolishing

every word "Old" in the titles of parts when they get onto the Parts Tracker. I just ask to continue doing this.

</code>

Do Not Use 'Old' in a Part Title - Revision history

Steffen at 00:42, 8 April 2018

Steffen at 00:42, 8 April 2018

Steffen at 00:41, 8 April 2018

Steffen: Steffen moved page De Facto PT Standards to Do Not Use 'Old' in a Part Title

Timgould at 22:23, 1 January 2012

Timgould at 22:20, 1 January 2012

Timgould at 22:15, 1 January 2012

Timgould: Created page with "Parts with 'old' in the name ====================================================================== At Mon May 4 00:08:03 2009, the following review was posted: R..."

Timgould: Created page with "Parts with 'old' in the name `====================================================================== At Mon May 4 00:08:03 2009, the following review was posted: R..."`