|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == Parts with 'old' in the name == | | == Parts with 'old' in the name == |
|
| |
|
| <verbatim>
| | From [http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x584.dat This discussion] |
| ======================================================================
| |
| At Mon May 4 00:08:03 2009, the following review was posted:
| |
|
| |
|
| Reviewer: Steffen
| | <code> |
| Certification: hold
| |
| Comments:
| |
| "old" should be removed from part name.
| |
| (Each part at some point in time will become "old".)
| |
| | |
| ======================================================================
| |
| At Sat Dec 31 22:55:06 2011, the following review was posted:
| |
| | |
| Reviewer: timgould
| |
| Certification: certify
| |
| Comments:
| |
| Think the old is appropriate here. Other bushes are variants of each other but this represents an old, depreciated 'standard'.
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| ======================================================================
| |
| At Sun Jan 1 04:30:06 2012, the following review was posted:
| |
| | |
| Reviewer: Steffen
| |
| Certification: hold
| |
| Comments:
| |
| I know, but we usually do not add "old" to titles, though.
| |
| The reason is that every part potentially can become "old",
| |
| when something new comes out which replaces it.
| |
| We describe what the part is and does, and that's it.
| |
| Its age is not part of its function.
| |
| | |
| ======================================================================
| |
| At Sun Jan 1 09:05:04 2012, the following review was posted:
| |
| | |
| Reviewer: timgould
| |
| Certification: certify
| |
| Comments:
| |
| The part fits with the existing library Old Type 2. Hold is, IMO, inappropriate unless you are willing to change both the existing file and this one with a new standard. Otherwise it is just reducing approved parts for your whims.
| |
| | |
| | |
| ======================================================================
| |
| At Sun Jan 1 10:30:07 2012, the following review was posted:
| |
| | |
| Reviewer: mikeheide
| |
| Certification: novote
| |
| Comments:
| |
| I am with Steffen here. If we have another part in the library with 'old' then we should also change that parts description.
| |
| | |
| ======================================================================
| |
| At Sun Jan 1 15:35:02 2012, the following review was posted: | | At Sun Jan 1 15:35:02 2012, the following review was posted: |
|
| |
|
| Line 59: |
Line 12: |
| We have followed over years now the practice of abolishing | | We have followed over years now the practice of abolishing |
| every word "Old" in the titles of parts when they get onto the Parts Tracker. I just ask to continue doing this. | | every word "Old" in the titles of parts when they get onto the Parts Tracker. I just ask to continue doing this. |
| </verbatim> | | </code> |